linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: Fix QDU1000 description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <175bd8b0-83b8-45d0-99bd-1e9384fed3f7@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:58:50 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: Fix QDU1000
 description

On 12/06/2024 08:27, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> QDU1000 DTSI comes with one LLCC0-7 base addresses. Updating
> dt-bindings accordingly.
> 
> Fixes: f0f99f371822 ("dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: correct QDU1000 reg entries")

You are basically reverting without saying this is a revert and without
explanation.

What's happening with QDU1000? Why it is such a mess that DTS was
totally not matching bindings drivers and now suddenly we need to revert
commits?

Best regards,
Krzysztof