linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 1/3] memory: fsl_ifc: Make FSL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <171818062457.17232.8716946182820856760.b4-ty@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:26:14 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
	Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
	Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 1/3] memory: fsl_ifc: Make FSL_IFC config visible and selectable


On Thu, 30 May 2024 16:46:36 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> While use of fsl_ifc driver with NAND flash is fine, as the fsl_ifc_nand
> driver selects FSL_IFC automatically, we need the CONFIG_FSL_IFC option to
> be selectable for platforms using fsl_ifc with NOR flash.
> 
> 

Applied first patch only, because:
1. I did not get acks for the defconfigs,
2. I do not consider stable defconfig as a hard-bisectability requirment, thus
it can break within one release as long as next is not affected.

The last statement is kind of not true, because next is now affected, so,
Esben, I think you should resend the defconfigs to respective platform
maintainers. To recall: arm64 goes via your SoC subarch/platform maintainers,
not arm64 maintainers.

Applied, thanks!

[1/3] memory: fsl_ifc: Make FSL_IFC config visible and selectable
      https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux-mem-ctrl/c/9ba0cae3cac07c21c583f9ff194f74043f90d29c

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>