[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240612133732.GW791043@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:37:32 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] iommu: Add attach handle to struct iopf_group
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 12:05:10PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> @@ -206,20 +182,49 @@ void iommu_report_device_fault(struct device *dev, struct iopf_fault *evt)
> if (group == &abort_group)
> goto err_abort;
>
> - group->domain = get_domain_for_iopf(dev, fault);
> - if (!group->domain)
> + if (fault->prm.flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID) {
> + group->attach_handle = iommu_attach_handle_get(dev->iommu_group,
> + fault->prm.pasid,
> + 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(group->attach_handle)) {
> + if (!device_iommu_capable(dev, IOMMU_CAP_USER_IOASID_TABLE))
> + goto err_abort;
I'm not excited about calling a function pointer on every fault. Let's
just add a constant flag to iommu_ops?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists