[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b8b2ea4-e07f-086f-c14b-0c9acb151aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:57:09 +0200
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Sam Sun <samsun1006219@...il.com>,
x86@...nel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, xrivendell7@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] jump_label: Simplify and clarify
static_key_fast_inc_cpus_locked()
> Make the code more obvious and add proper comments to avoid future head
> scratching.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/jump_label.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
> +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
> @@ -162,22 +162,24 @@ bool static_key_slow_inc_cpuslocked(stru
> if (static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled(key))
> return true;
>
> - jump_label_lock();
> - if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) == 0) {
> - atomic_set(&key->enabled, -1);
> + guard(mutex)(&jump_label_mutex);
> + /* Try to mark it as 'enabling in progress. */
Missing closing quotation mark above.
> + if (!atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 0, -1)) {
This can be:
int tmp = 0;
if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, &tmp, -1)) {
...
and will result in more optimal code and will IMO also be more readable
because it is clear that the code is executed when cmpxchg succeeds.
(BTW: The atomic_read()/atomic_set() pair can also be converted to
cmpxchg in static_key_enable_cpuslocked().)
Uros.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists