linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4, 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add snps,p2p3tranok quirk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:03:55 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: joswang <joswang1221@...il.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, balbi@...nel.org,
 linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jos Wang <joswang@...ovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4, 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add snps,p2p3tranok quirk

On 13/06/2024 15:19, joswang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 2:17 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/06/2024 17:23, joswang wrote:
>>>
>>> +  snps,p2p3tranok-quirk:
>>> +    description:
>>> +      When set, the controller transitions directly from phy power state
>>> +      P2 to P3 or from state P3 to P2. Note that this can only be set
>>> +      if the USB3 PHY supports direct p3 to p2 or p2 to p3 conversion.
>>> +    type: boolean
>>
>> Hm? You respond to feedback and, without waiting for my answer,
>> immediately send new version?
>>
>> No. Read feedback on your previous version. Drop the quirk.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> Thank you for your help in reviewing the code.
> Sorry, I submitted three patches in total. Patch1 (the current patch)
> and patch2 solve one case, and patch3 solves another case. Because
> patch3 needs to submit a new version, I resubmitted v3 and v4
> versions.
> Patch2 is under review, and there is no clear conclusion. For now,
> patch1 does not need to be paid attention to. I will notify you when
> patch2 has a clear conclusion.

This does no work like this.

Implement feedback and send new version of entire patchset *ONCE* there
is conclusion. Sending new version of some parts ignoring feedback or
skipping conclusion is not the way.

Sorry.

Still drop.

Or in case we still have here misunderstanding - so far it looks like: NAK

Best regards,
Krzysztof