[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e09fecf4-bde2-4feb-8312-22c530c6a960@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:18:11 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Jonathan Cameron
<jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add AD4695 and similar ADCs
On 13/06/2024 15:57, David Lechner wrote:
>
>>
>>> + - const: adi,ad4695
>>> + - items:
>>> + - const: adi,ad4697-wlcsp
>>> + - const: adi,ad4697
>>> + # same chips with higher max sample rate
>
> I suppose one could make the argument that the programming model is
> the same on these too, but the maximum sampling frequency does seem
> like an important bit of information so that you don't try to set
> the conversion trigger rate too high.
>
which property is that? I don't see differences in the driver, so I
don't get how these wlcsp compatibles allow you to control value of
conversion trigger.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists