linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: add missing MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <132dedc1-ee11-44d8-b684-0ffbf994d164@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:19:16 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
 Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro

On 6/12/24 9:46 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCOM specific hooks to UFS controller platform driver");
>   MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

That sounds weird to me. I think we are better of with no module
description than with the above description.

How about the following description?

"Qualcomm UFS host controller driver".

Thanks,

Bart.