[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ed1ecee-78bb-450e-933f-1e06b1e392bd@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:35:07 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/202] 5.4.278-rc1 review
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 01:31:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.278 release.
> There are 202 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
net/nfc/nci/core.c:1455:15: error:
mixing declarations and code is incompatible with standards before C99
[-Werror,-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
1455 | unsigned int hdr_size = NCI_CTRL_HDR_SIZE;
Maybe enable C99 on older kernel branches ?
The code is
+static bool nci_valid_size(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(NCI_CTRL_HDR_SIZE != NCI_DATA_HDR_SIZE);
+ unsigned int hdr_size = NCI_CTRL_HDR_SIZE;
Swapping those two lines would be another possible fix.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists