[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zmsg8ciwSp1a_864@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:43:38 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Discard zero mask with function kvm_dirty_ring_reset
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, Bibo Mao wrote:
> Function kvm_reset_dirty_gfn may be called with parameters cur_slot /
> cur_offset / mask are all zero, it does not represent real dirty page.
> It is not necessary to clear dirty page in this condition. Also return
> value of macro __fls() is undefined if mask is zero which is called in
> funciton kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(). Here just discard it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
> index 86d267db87bb..05f4c1c40cc7 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
> @@ -147,14 +147,16 @@ int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring)
> continue;
> }
> }
> - kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
> + if (mask)
> + kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
> cur_slot = next_slot;
> cur_offset = next_offset;
> mask = 1;
> first_round = false;
> }
>
> - kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
> + if (mask)
> + kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
Given that mask must be checked before __fls(), just do:
diff --git a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
index 86d267db87bb..7bc74969a819 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ static void kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, u32 slot, u64 offset, u64 mask)
struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
int as_id, id;
+ if (!mask)
+ return;
+
as_id = slot >> 16;
id = (u16)slot;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists