linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add R9A09G057 core clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 19:55:18 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add R9A09G057 core clocks

Hi Geert,

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 4:15 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 2:56 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On 13/06/2024 11:57, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > >>> of section 4.4.2 which cannot be controlled by CLKON register.
> > >>> ---
> > >>>  include/dt-bindings/clock/r9a09g057-cpg.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > >>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/r9a09g057-cpg.h
> > >>
> > >> Missing vendor prefix.
> > >>
> > > OK, Is this just for new includes being added, or do you want me to
> > > rename the existing Renesas specific includes in here which dont have
> > > vendor prefix?
> >
> > Didn't we discuss it?
> >
> > I commented only about this binding.
>
> Yes we did, in the context of the R-Car V4M DT binding definitions,
> which became include/dt-bindings/clock/renesas,r8a779h0-cpg-mssr.h
> But Prabhakar was not involved there.
>
> Note that I also asked to include the vendor prefix, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/CAMuHMdU7+O-+v=2V83AjQmTWyGy_a-AHgU_nPMDHnVUtYt89iQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
Oops I missed that review comment.

Cheers,
Prabhakar