[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f88abfe3-a66c-4e65-b627-7adf7f04580f@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:33:01 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 2/2] net: phy: dp83tg720: get initial master/slave
configuration
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:30:34PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Get initial master/slave configuration, otherwise ethtool
> wont be able to provide this information until link is
> established. This makes troubleshooting harder, since wrong
> role configuration would prevent the link start.
I looked at how genphy_c45_read_status() works. If we have
phydev->autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE then genphy_c45_baset1_read_status()
is called which sets phydev->master_slave_get. If not AUTONEG_ENABLE
it calls genphy_c45_read_pma() which ends up calling
genphy_c45_pma_baset1_read_master_slave().
So it seems like the .read_status op should be setting master/slave
each time it is called, and not one time during .config_init.
What do you think?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists