[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240613131853.814a40233d36d57f868f9a39@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:18:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>, Christoph Hellwig
<hch@...radead.org>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>, Baoquan He
<bhe@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, hailong liu
<hailong.liu@...o.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>,
steve.kang@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [Resend PATCHv4 1/1] mm: fix incorrect vbq reference in
purge_fragmented_block
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 19:33:16 +0200 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com> wrote:
> > 2.25.1
> >
> Yes there is a mess with holding wrong vbq->lock and vmap_blocks xarray.
>
> The patch looks good to me. One small nit from my side is a commit
> message. To me it is vague and it should be improved.
>
> Could you please use Hailong.Liu <hailong.liu@...o.com> explanation
> of the issue and resend the patch?
>
> See it here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/6/2/2
>
> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
Thanks, I'll queue this (with a cc:stable) for testing and shall await
the updated changelog.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists