[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240613145817.32992753@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:58:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nalramli@...tly.com, Saeed Mahameed
<saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, "open
list:MELLANOX MLX5 core VPI driver" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, Tariq
Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v5 2/2] net/mlx5e: Add per queue netdev-genl stats
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 23:25:12 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > + for (i = priv->channels.params.num_channels; i < priv->stats_nch; i++) {
>
> IIUC, per the current kernel implementation, the lower parts won't be
> completed in a loop over [0..real_num_rx_queues-1], as that loop is
> conditional, happening only if the queues are active.
Could you rephrase this? Is priv->channels.params.num_channels
non-zero also when device is closed? I'm just guessing from
the code, TBH, I can't parse your reply :(
> I would like the kernel to drop that condition, and stop forcing the
> device driver to conditionally include this part in the base.
>
> Otherwise, the lower parts need to be added here.
You'd need a stronger (and clearly explained) argument to change
the core. If you're saying that the kernel should be able to dump
queue stats for disabled queues - that seems rather questionable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists