Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:07:18 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+b778ac10fe2a0cd72517@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: amir73il@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, miklos@...redi.hu, 
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in ovl_copy_up_one

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    771ed66105de Merge tag 'clk-fixes-for-linus' of git://git...
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15018032980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=399230c250e8119c
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b778ac10fe2a0cd72517
compiler:       gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1253e6f6980000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=15b2d41c980000

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-771ed661.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8d8815105845/vmlinux-771ed661.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/93a43d933942/bzImage-771ed661.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+b778ac10fe2a0cd72517@...kaller.appspotmail.com

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00366-g771ed66105de #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor222/5195 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888024f6a420 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ovl_do_copy_up fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:967 [inline]
ffff888024f6a420 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ovl_copy_up_one+0x82a/0x3490 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:1168

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888024f6a420 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ovl_tmpfile+0x15b/0x6f0 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:1363

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(sb_writers#5);
  lock(sb_writers#5);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

3 locks held by syz-executor222/5195:
 #0: ffff88801bbe2420 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_tmpfile fs/namei.c:3761 [inline]
 #0: ffff88801bbe2420 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_openat+0xc0f/0x29f0 fs/namei.c:3798
 #1: ffff888024f6a420 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ovl_tmpfile+0x15b/0x6f0 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:1363
 #2: ffff88803037a808 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_inode_lock_interruptible fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:657 [inline]
 #2: ffff88803037a808 (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ovl_copy_up_start+0x4d/0x2f0 fs/overlayfs/util.c:719

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5195 Comm: syz-executor222 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00366-g771ed66105de #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3062 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3856 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x20e6/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
 __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1655 [inline]
 sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1791 [inline]
 ovl_start_write+0x130/0x310 fs/overlayfs/util.c:31
 ovl_do_copy_up fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:967 [inline]
 ovl_copy_up_one+0x82a/0x3490 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:1168
 ovl_copy_up_flags+0x18d/0x200 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:1223
 ovl_create_tmpfile fs/overlayfs/dir.c:1317 [inline]
 ovl_tmpfile+0x2b8/0x6f0 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:1373
 vfs_tmpfile+0x2be/0x540 fs/namei.c:3701
 do_tmpfile fs/namei.c:3764 [inline]
 path_openat+0xc8e/0x29f0 fs/namei.c:3798
 do_filp_open+0x1dc/0x430 fs/namei.c:3834
 do_sys_openat2+0x17a/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1405
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1420 [inline]
 __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1428 [inline]
 __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1424 [inline]
 __x64_sys_open+0x154/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1424
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f9268e3ef49
Code: 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 67 17 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fff6faf26d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fff6faf26e0 RCX: 00007f9268e3ef49
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000591002 RDI: 0000000020000100
RBP: 00007fff6faf26e8 R08: 00007f9268e0bf50 R09: 00007f9268e0bf50
R10: 00007f9268e0bf50 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fff6faf2948 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Powered by blists - more mailing lists