linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] i2c: octeon: refactor hlc r/w operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:55:34 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Aryan Srivastava <aryan.srivastava@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, 
	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] i2c: octeon: refactor hlc r/w operations

Hi Aryan,

> +/* Construct and send i2c transaction core cmd for read ops */
> +static int octeon_i2c_hlc_read_cmd(struct octeon_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg msg, u64 cmd)
> +{
> +	u64 ext = 0;
> +
> +	if (octeon_i2c_hlc_ext(i2c, msg, &cmd, &ext))
> +		octeon_i2c_writeq_flush(ext, i2c->twsi_base + SW_TWSI_EXT(i2c));

I think this check here is the only logical change I see. Right?

If so, can you please describe in the log why you made this
change?

Thanks,
Andi

> +	return octeon_i2c_hlc_cmd_send(i2c, cmd);
> +}