[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <038eaf17-7806-4be4-b98d-e936afa1001f@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:11:00 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@...esys.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Chancel Liu <chancel.liu@....com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpc32xx: Add lpc32xx i2s DT
binding
On 12/06/2024 10:06, Piotr Wojtaszczyk wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> Changes for v2:
>>> - Added maintainers field
>>> - Dropped clock-names
>>> - Dropped unused unneded interrupts field
>>
>> Does the device has interrupts or not? This should justify decision, not
>> current usage by drivers.
> Yes the device has interrupts but feeding data FIFOs is handled by DMA
> (amba-pl08x.c).
> Should I declare interrupts despite they are not used in the compatible driver?
Yes.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists