[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240612180419.391f584d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:04:19 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
<ast@...erby.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Edward Cree
<ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>,
linux-net-drivers@....com, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon
Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>, oss-drivers@...igine.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
i.maximets@....org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: flower: validate encapsulation
control flags
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:33:50 +0000 Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
> Now that all drivers properly rejects unsupported flower control flags
> used with FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CONTROL, then time has come to add similar
> checks to the drivers supporting FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL.
Thanks for doing this work!
Do you have any more of such series left? Could we perhaps consider
recording the driver support somewhere in struct net_device and do
the rejecting in the core? That's much easier to extend when adding
new flags than updating all the drivers.
This series I think may not be a great first candidate as IIUC all
drivers would reject so the flag would be half-dead...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists