[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240613084725.GC23371@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:47:25 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
Cc: david@...morbit.com, djwong@...nel.org, chandan.babu@...cle.com,
brauner@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org,
mcgrof@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, hare@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
Zi Yan <zi.yan@...t.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
p.raghav@...sung.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de,
gost.dev@...sung.com, cl@...amperecomputing.com,
john.g.garry@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/11] xfs: enable block size larger than page size
support
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:59:02PM +0000, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> @@ -3019,6 +3019,11 @@ xfs_ialloc_setup_geometry(
> igeo->ialloc_align = mp->m_dalign;
> else
> igeo->ialloc_align = 0;
> +
> + if (mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
> + igeo->min_folio_order = mp->m_sb.sb_blocklog - PAGE_SHIFT;
> + else
> + igeo->min_folio_order = 0;
> }
The minimum folio order isn't really part of the inode (allocation)
geometry, is it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists