[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b110726e-d496-4975-8089-57a4931da47d@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:03:00 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, Tony Nguyen
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric
Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
<nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next 03/12] idpf: split &idpf_queue into 4
strictly-typed queue structures
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 09:53:08 +0100
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 03:48:37PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> Currently, sizeof(struct idpf_queue) is 32 Kb.
>> This is due to the 12-bit hashtable declaration at the end of the queue.
>> This HT is needed only for Tx queues when the flow scheduling mode is
>> enabled. But &idpf_queue is unified for all of the queue types,
>> provoking excessive memory usage.
>> The unified structure in general makes the code less effective via
>> suboptimal fields placement. You can't avoid that unless you make unions
>> each 2 fields. Even then, different field alignment etc., doesn't allow
>> you to optimize things to the limit.
>> Split &idpf_queue into 4 structures corresponding to the queue types:
>> RQ (Rx queue), SQ (Tx queue), FQ (buffer queue), and CQ (completion
>> queue). Place only needed fields there and shortcuts handy for hotpath.
>> Allocate the abovementioned hashtable dynamically and only when needed,
>> keeping &idpf_tx_queue relatively short (192 bytes, same as Rx). This HT
>> is used only for OOO completions, which aren't really hotpath anyway.
>> Note that this change must be done atomically, otherwise it's really
>> easy to get lost and miss something.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -1158,20 +1325,22 @@ static void idpf_rxq_set_descids(struct idpf_vport *vport, struct idpf_queue *q)
>> */
>> static int idpf_txq_group_alloc(struct idpf_vport *vport, u16 num_txq)
>> {
>> - bool flow_sch_en;
>> - int err, i;
>> + bool split, flow_sch_en;
>> + int i;
>>
>> vport->txq_grps = kcalloc(vport->num_txq_grp,
>> sizeof(*vport->txq_grps), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!vport->txq_grps)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + split = idpf_is_queue_model_split(vport->txq_model);
>> flow_sch_en = !idpf_is_cap_ena(vport->adapter, IDPF_OTHER_CAPS,
>> VIRTCHNL2_CAP_SPLITQ_QSCHED);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < vport->num_txq_grp; i++) {
>> struct idpf_txq_group *tx_qgrp = &vport->txq_grps[i];
>> struct idpf_adapter *adapter = vport->adapter;
>> + struct idpf_txq_stash *stashes;
>> int j;
>>
>> tx_qgrp->vport = vport;
>> @@ -1180,45 +1349,62 @@ static int idpf_txq_group_alloc(struct idpf_vport *vport, u16 num_txq)
>> for (j = 0; j < tx_qgrp->num_txq; j++) {
>> tx_qgrp->txqs[j] = kzalloc(sizeof(*tx_qgrp->txqs[j]),
>> GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!tx_qgrp->txqs[j]) {
>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>> + if (!tx_qgrp->txqs[j])
>> goto err_alloc;
>> - }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (split && flow_sch_en) {
>> + stashes = kcalloc(num_txq, sizeof(*stashes),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Here stashes is assigned a memory allocation and
> then then assigned to tx_qgrp->stashes a few lines below...
>
>> + if (!stashes)
>> + goto err_alloc;
>> +
>> + tx_qgrp->stashes = stashes;
>> }
>>
>> for (j = 0; j < tx_qgrp->num_txq; j++) {
>> - struct idpf_queue *q = tx_qgrp->txqs[j];
>> + struct idpf_tx_queue *q = tx_qgrp->txqs[j];
>>
>> q->dev = &adapter->pdev->dev;
>> q->desc_count = vport->txq_desc_count;
>> q->tx_max_bufs = idpf_get_max_tx_bufs(adapter);
>> q->tx_min_pkt_len = idpf_get_min_tx_pkt_len(adapter);
>> - q->vport = vport;
>> + q->netdev = vport->netdev;
>> q->txq_grp = tx_qgrp;
>> - hash_init(q->sched_buf_hash);
>>
>> - if (flow_sch_en)
>> - set_bit(__IDPF_Q_FLOW_SCH_EN, q->flags);
>> + if (!split) {
>> + q->clean_budget = vport->compln_clean_budget;
>> + idpf_queue_assign(CRC_EN, q,
>> + vport->crc_enable);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!flow_sch_en)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (split) {
>
> ... but here elements of stashes seem to be assigned to q->stash
> without stashes having being initialised.
>
> Flagged by Smatch
Hi! Yes, I saw the report, but isn't it a false positive?
Allocation happens when `split && flow_sch_en`, and here we have
if (!flow_sch_en)
continue;
if (split)
// assign
IOW the assignment can't happen without the allocation?
>
>> + q->stash = &stashes[j];
>> + hash_init(q->stash->sched_buf_hash);
>> + }
>> +
>> + idpf_queue_set(FLOW_SCH_EN, q);
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists