linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4, 3/3] usb: dwc3: core: Workaround for CSR read timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 19:46:14 +0800
From: joswang <joswang1221@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, 
	Jos Wang <joswang@...ovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4, 3/3] usb: dwc3: core: Workaround for CSR read timeout

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 1:04 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 11:39:22PM +0800, joswang wrote:
> > From: Jos Wang <joswang@...ovo.com>
> >
> > This is a workaround for STAR 4846132, which only affects
> > DWC_usb31 version2.00a operating in host mode.
> >
> > There is a problem in DWC_usb31 version 2.00a operating
> > in host mode that would cause a CSR read timeout When CSR
> > read coincides with RAM Clock Gating Entry. By disable
> > Clock Gating, sacrificing power consumption for normal
> > operation.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jos Wang <joswang@...ovo.com>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - add "dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add snps,p2p3tranok quirk" patch,
> >   this patch does not make any changes
> > v2 -> v3:
> > - code refactor
> > - modify comment, add STAR number, workaround applied in host mode
> > - modify commit message, add STAR number, workaround applied in host mode
> > - modify Author Jos Wang
> > v3 -> v4:
> > - modify commit message, add Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> This thread is crazy, look at:
>         https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240612153922.2531-1-joswang1221@gmail.com/
> for how it looks.  How do I pick out the proper patches to review/apply
> there at all?  What would you do if you were in my position except just
> delete the whole thing?
>
> Just properly submit new versions of patches (hint, without the ','), as
> the documentation file says to, as new threads each time, with all
> commits, and all should be fine.
>
> We even have tools that can do this for you semi-automatically, why not
> use them?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
The following incorrect operation caused the problem you mentioned:
git send-email --in-reply-to command sends the new version patch
git format-patch --subject-prefix='PATCH v3

Should I resend the v5 patch now?