[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d0a7a82-6262-40e6-be25-4a1c4d8df2fe@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:55:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add R9A09G057 core clocks
On 13/06/2024 11:57, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>>> of section 4.4.2 which cannot be controlled by CLKON register.
>>> ---
>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/r9a09g057-cpg.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/r9a09g057-cpg.h
>>
>> Missing vendor prefix.
>>
> OK, Is this just for new includes being added, or do you want me to
> rename the existing Renesas specific includes in here which dont have
> vendor prefix?
Didn't we discuss it?
I commented only about this binding.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists