lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:13:29 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
 Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@...com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] DONOTMERGE: dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: add TI's opp
 table compatible

On 13/06/2024 14:20, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 01:09:23PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
>>
>>> On June 12, 2024 thus sayeth Conor Dooley:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 11:41:52AM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
>>>>> The JTAG_USER_ID_USERCODE efuse address, which is located inside the
>>>>> WKUP_CTRL_MMR0 range holds information to identify the speed grades of
>>>>> various components on TI's K3 SoCs. Add a compatible to allow the
>>>>> cpufreq driver to obtain the data to limit the maximum frequency for the
>>>>> CPUs under Linux control.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>
>>>>
>>>> $subject: DONOTMERGE: dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: add TI's opp table compatible
>>>>
>>>> Okay, if this isn't for merging then I won't Ack it.
>>>
>>> Ha! Nice. If I don't hear anything from anyone else I'll send a v2 in a 
>>> few hours.
>>
>> What's the point of all the DONOTMERGE nonsense?
> 
> AFAICT, TI live in fear of subsystem maintainers merging the dts patches,
> so they do this.

And want some strict timeframe of merging bindings (via subsystem) and
DTS (via SoC tree), which causes all weird submissions like this above
or sending bindings without users.

So far I can live with it but if more such peculiarities come up, then
sorry, fix your process/tools instead of putting burden on maintainers
and community.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ