[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240614151955.1949-1-jszhang@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 23:19:55 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/riscv-intc: Remove asmlinkage
The two functions riscv_intc_aia_irq() and riscv_intc_irq()
are only called by C functions.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
---
Hi riscv maintainers and all,
Related question:
I believe the asmlinkage in riscv is a nop, is it OK to
remove asmlinkage from all riscv code?
Anyway, no matter what will be the decision, it's correct to
remove asmlinkage in riscv intc driver as this patch does.
thanks
drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
index 4f3a12383a1e..47f3200476da 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static unsigned int riscv_intc_nr_irqs __ro_after_init = BITS_PER_LONG;
static unsigned int riscv_intc_custom_base __ro_after_init = BITS_PER_LONG;
static unsigned int riscv_intc_custom_nr_irqs __ro_after_init;
-static asmlinkage void riscv_intc_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static void riscv_intc_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long cause = regs->cause & ~CAUSE_IRQ_FLAG;
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static asmlinkage void riscv_intc_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to handle interrupt (cause: %ld)\n", cause);
}
-static asmlinkage void riscv_intc_aia_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static void riscv_intc_aia_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long topi;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists