[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zmx1H5MyjWvoRdwz@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 17:51:43 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@...esys.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Chancel Liu <chancel.liu@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] ASoC: fsl: Add i2s and pcm drivers for LPC32xx
CPUs
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 06:46:46PM +0200, Piotr Wojtaszczyk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 6:42 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 06:24:50PM +0200, Piotr Wojtaszczyk wrote:
> > > Ok. Later I will add a sound card driver to phytec3250 board which uses
> > > arch/arm/configs/lpc32xx_defconfig config file so that the COMPILE_TEST
> > > won't be needed.
> > Why would a defconfig affect the Kconfig?
> I guess when lpc32xx_defconfig enables the SND_SOC_FSL_LPC3XXX then the
> COMPILE_TEST won't be needed or does it?
The whole point of COMPILE_TEST is to allow the driver to be covered
when people aren't building for whatever specific platform would
actually use it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists