linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-sk: Add support for multiple CAN instances

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 10:45:15 +0530
From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
To: <nm@...com>, Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
CC: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, <kristo@...nel.org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <b-kapoor@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-sk: Add support for multiple CAN instances

Hi Beleswar Padhi,

On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:45:12 +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> CAN instance 0 in the mcu domain is brought on the J721E-SK board
> through header J1. Thus, add its respective transceiver 1 dt node to add
> support for this CAN instance.
> 
> CAN instances 0, 5 and 9 in the main domain are brought on the J721E-SK
> board through headers J5, J6 and J2 respectively. Thus, add their
> respective transceivers 2, 3 and 4 dt nodes to add support for these CAN
> instances.
> 
> [...]

I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1].
Thank you!

[1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-sk: Add support for multiple CAN instances
      commit: 021d3d5f0741e5393a7a110ac909fc746b1e0a4d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Vignesh