linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] zram: use copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240614053108.GC479513@google.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 14:31:08 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: use copy_page for full page copy

On (24/06/13 22:25), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:04:22AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > commit 42e99bd975fd ("zram: optimize memory operations with
> > clear_page()/copy_page()") optimize page copy/clean operations, but
> > then commit d72e9a7a93e4 ("zram: do not use copy_page with non-page
> > aligned address") removes the optimization because there's memory
> > corruption at that time, the reason was well explained. But after
> > commit 1f7319c74275 ("zram: partial IO refactoring"), partial IO uses
> > alloc_page() instead of kmalloc to allocate a page, so we can bring
> > back the optimization.
> > 
> > commit 80ba4caf8ba9 ("zram: use copy_page for full page copy") brings
> > back partial optimization, missed one point in zram_write_page().
> > optimize the full page copying in zram_write_page() with copy_page()
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > index 3acd7006ad2c..4b2b5098062f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > @@ -1478,11 +1478,13 @@ static int zram_write_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index)
> >  	dst = zs_map_object(zram->mem_pool, handle, ZS_MM_WO);
> >  
> >  	src = zstrm->buffer;
> > -	if (comp_len == PAGE_SIZE)
> > +	if (comp_len == PAGE_SIZE) {
> >  		src = kmap_local_page(page);
> > -	memcpy(dst, src, comp_len);
> > -	if (comp_len == PAGE_SIZE)
> > +		copy_page(dst, src);
> >  		kunmap_local(src);
> > +	} else {
> > +		memcpy(dst, src, comp_len);
> > +	}
> 
> I know this is pre-existing code, but why do we need to kmap
> for comp_len == PAGE_SIZE and not for the other cases?  Something
> feels really obsfucated here.

It is tricky a little.

If we managed to compress page (size < zsmalloc uncompressible watermark)
then src is per-CPU buffer with compressed data.  Otherwise src is original
page (with uncompressed data).