[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cover.1718352022.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 10:10:10 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] mfd: stm32-timers: Make register definition more flexible
Hello,
I'm not sure that everyone will agree the changes in here are
worthwhile, but I like them. One surprise is that this makes the
generated code for drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c more compact (see patch 4 for
a bloat-o-meter statistic). I'm surprised because it boils down to gcc
not noticing that
mask = ((((1UL))) << (1 + 4 * ((1) - 1))) << (ch * 4);
is equivalent to
mask = ((((1UL))) << (1 + 4 * ((ch + 1) - 1)));
.
I'm unsure what to suggest for how to merge this series. I have some
further changes on my agenda to drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c, so either
merging this via pwm or a stable branch would be great for me.
Best regards
Uwe
Uwe Kleine-König (4):
mfd: stm32-timers: Unify alignment of register definition
mfd: stm32-timers: Add some register definitions with a parameter
mfd: stm32-timers: Drop TIM_DIER_CC_IE(x) in favour of
TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x)
pwm-stm32: Make use of parametrised register definitions
drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c | 4 +-
drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 22 ++--
include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h | 179 ++++++++++++++++--------------
3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
base-commit: 1613e604df0cd359cf2a7fbd9be7a0bcfacfabd0
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists