[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240614010028.48262-1-lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 09:00:28 +0800
From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
To: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org,
corbet@....net,
hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: exception-tables.rst: Fix the wrong steps referenced
When it was in text format, it correctly hardcoded steps 8a to 8c.
However, after it was converted to RST, the sequence numbers were
auto-generated during rendering and became incorrect after some
steps were inserted.
Change it to refer to steps a to c in a relative way.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
---
Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst
index efde1fef4fbd..562d1bc6d448 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ vma occurs?
c) execution continues at local label 2 (address of the
instruction immediately after the faulting user access).
-The steps 8a to 8c in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction.
+The steps a to c above in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction.
That's it, mostly. If you look at our example, you might ask why
we set EAX to -EFAULT in the exception handler code. Well, the
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists