Message-ID: <37e7b6a5-5345-48cb-996f-c50ec935cded@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 10:39:05 +0200
From: neil.armstrong@...aro.org
To: Andy Yan <andyshrk@....com>
Cc: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
 Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
 Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
 Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>, Heiko Stübner
 <heiko@...ech.de>, Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Yao <markyao0591@...il.com>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
 Alexandre ARNOUD <aarnoud@...com>, Luis de Arquer <ldearquer@...il.com>,
 Algea Cao <algea.cao@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] drm/bridge: synopsys: Add DW HDMI QP TX controller
 driver

On 14/06/2024 08:56, Andy Yan wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Neil，
> 
> At 2024-06-05 19:48:09, "Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 05/06/2024 12:11, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>> On 6/5/24 12:34 AM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>> On 6/4/24 11:41 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>>>> Hi Cristian.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 10:32:04PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Sam,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/1/24 5:32 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Cristian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a few drive-by comments below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	Sam
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +static const struct drm_connector_funcs dw_hdmi_qp_connector_funcs = {
>>>>>>>> +	.fill_modes = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes,
>>>>>>>> +	.detect = dw_hdmi_connector_detect,
>>>>>>>> +	.destroy = drm_connector_cleanup,
>>>>>>>> +	.force = dw_hdmi_qp_connector_force,
>>>>>>>> +	.reset = drm_atomic_helper_connector_reset,
>>>>>>>> +	.atomic_duplicate_state = drm_atomic_helper_connector_duplicate_state,
>>>>>>>> +	.atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_connector_destroy_state,
>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +static int dw_hdmi_qp_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>>>>>>>> +				    enum drm_bridge_attach_flags flags)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> +	struct dw_hdmi *hdmi = bridge->driver_private;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +	if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR)
>>>>>>>> +		return drm_bridge_attach(bridge->encoder, hdmi->next_bridge,
>>>>>>>> +					 bridge, flags);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +	return dw_hdmi_connector_create(hdmi, &dw_hdmi_qp_connector_funcs);
>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are there any users left that requires the display driver to create the
>>>>>>> connector?
>>>>>>> In other words - could this driver fail if DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR
>>>>>>> is not passed and drop dw_hdmi_connector_create()?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did not try to verify this - just a naive question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've just tested this and it doesn't work - dw_hdmi_connector_create()
>>>>>> is still needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm, seems the display driver or some other bridge driver fails to
>>>>> support "DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR".
>>>>> what other drivers are involved?
>>>>
>>>> Could it be related to the glue driver (updated in the next patch) which
>>>> is also responsible for setting up the encoder?
>>>>
>>>>> Note that my comments here should be seen as potential future
>>>>> improvements, and do not block the patch from being used.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the heads up! Will try to get back to this soon and investigate.
>>>    
>>> IIUC, modern bridges should not create the connector but rely on display
>>> drivers to take care of, which in this case is the VOP2 driver. However,
>>> it also handles some of the older SoCs relying on the non-QP variant of
>>> DW HDMI IP. Hence the existing dw-hdmi driver would be also impacted in
>>> order to come up with a proper solution.
>>>
>>> A quick check shows there are several users of this IP:
>>>
>>> $ git grep -E '= dw_hdmi_(bind|probe)\('
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/imx/imx8mp-hdmi-tx.c:    hdmi->dw_hdmi = dw_hdmi_probe(pdev, plat_data);
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c:      hdmi = dw_hdmi_probe(pdev, plat_data);
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/ipuv3/dw_hdmi-imx.c:        hdmi->hdmi = dw_hdmi_probe(pdev, match->data);
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-dw-hdmi.c:      hdmi = dw_hdmi_probe(pdev, &ingenic_dw_hdmi_plat_data);
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_hdmi.c:  meson_dw_hdmi->hdmi = dw_hdmi_probe(pdev, &meson_dw_hdmi->dw_plat_data);
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_dw_hdmi.c: hdmi = dw_hdmi_probe(pdev, &rcar_dw_hdmi_plat_data);
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi-rockchip.c:            hdmi->hdmi = dw_hdmi_bind(pdev, encoder, plat_data);
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_dw_hdmi.c:  hdmi->hdmi = dw_hdmi_bind(pdev, encoder, plat_data);
>>>
>>> I didn't check which display drivers would be involved, I'd guess there
>>> are quite a few of them as well. So it seems this ends up being a pretty
>>> complex task.
>>
>> If this would be a brand new driver, then it should only support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR,
>> so you should not create a connector from the driver.
>>
>> The fact dw-hdmi accepts an attach without the flag is for legacy purpose
>> since some DRM drivers haven't switched to DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR yes,
>> but it's a requirement for new bridges so at some point you'll need to make
>> sure the rockchip glue and drm driver supports DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR.
>>
>> This will greatly simplify the driver!
> 
> Based on the previous discussion， the DW HDMI QP drivers will be implemented like this：
> 
> Core bridge library：
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi-qp.c
> Rockchip platform specific glue：
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c
> 
> As a new bridge driver should only support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR,
> Is it acceptable if we implement the connector at  the rockchip glue dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c ？
> 
> Our current combination is a bit complex：
> The display controller driver is  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c ，which shared
> by rk3568， rk3588 and some upcoming soc like rk3528/rk3562.
> 
> For rk3588， we have totally new HDMI、DP、DSI2  IP， they need brand new bridge driver that
> should only support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR， and there is also an eDP on rk3588
> use analogix_dp_core.c that create connector by analogix_dp bridge。
> 
> For  rk3568， the HDMI/eDP/DSI IP are based on old IP， the corresponding drivers are dw-hdmi，analogix_dp
> and dw-mipi-dsi, they both create drm connector by it's bridge driver. And rk3528/rk3562 are like this too。
> 
> So if we can create drm_connector at glue side (such as dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c), let the interface driver decide
> if it should create drm_connector or not will make the vop2 driver simpler。

I think you should start migration to drm_bridge_connector instead of hacking dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c into
fitting into DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR.

You'll add technical dept, and the migration will be even harder afterwards.

But in any case, bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi-qp.c and rockchip/dw_hdmi_qp-rockchip.c should be send
in two separate patchsets, so how rockchip DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR is a different story.

Neil

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>>
>>> Cristian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists