linux-kernel - Re: Regression, thermal: core: battery reading wrong after wake from S3 [Was: Bug Report according to thermal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h7WnfQxhobA6B7S3Tvo-AnKTR9kP+5aexa6rixqpyHJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 12:18:06 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: "fhortner@...oo.de" <fhortner@...oo.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Regression, thermal: core: battery reading wrong after wake from
 S3 [Was: Bug Report according to thermal_core.c]

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 10:04 PM fhortner@...oo.de <fhortner@...oo.de> wrote:
>
> Am 13.06.24 um 17:14 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
>
> Let's see if the ACPI thermal zone is the real culprit.
>
> The attached patch only adds the delay for thermal zone 0 which is the
> ACPI thermal zone.  It also prints the ID and type for all of the
> resuming thermal zones.
>
> Please test it (removing all of the test changes/patches tried so far)
> and let me know what happens to the battery readings.
>
> Patch
>
> thermal-delay-resume.patch
>
> does not work. Output according to dmesg.txt
>
> Attached is a slightly modified version of the last patch I sent.
> Please test it and let me know if it addresses the problem you are
> seeing.
>
> If it helps, I think we are done with this at least for now.
>
> patch thermal-core-resume-prio.patch with .priority = -1 does work
>
> One more thing to try is the attached patch (independent of the
> previous one) to lower the priority of the thermal PM notifier to make
> it run always after the ACPI battery one.
>
> Please test this one too and let me know if it works for you.
>
> patch thermal-core-resume-prio.patch
>
> with .priority = INT_MIN does also work.
>
> If you need any further tests, please don't hesitate to tell me so.

No, thank you, I think you've done enough and it is appreciated.

I don't see any particular drawbacks of this approach and investing
more time in trying to get to the bottom of the issue is probably not
worth it.

I'm going to submit the last patch as the proposed solution.

> Thank you for your help!

No problem and thank you!