linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: mailbox: support P2A channel completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZmwnV_M3WX-4gJiH@bogus>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 12:19:51 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: mailbox: support P2A channel
 completion

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 11:31:43AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 10:19:42AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > 
> > diff --git i/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c w/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c
> > index adb69a6a0223..3bb3fba8f478 100644
> > --- i/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c
> > +++ w/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c
> > @@ -326,30 +326,25 @@ static void mailbox_fetch_notification(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
> >  static void mailbox_clear_channel(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo)
> >  {
> >         struct scmi_mailbox *smbox = cinfo->transport_info;
> > -       struct device *cdev = cinfo->dev;
> > -       struct mbox_chan *intr;
> > +       struct mbox_chan *intr_chan = NULL;
> >         int ret;
> > 
> >         shmem_clear_channel(smbox->shmem);
> > 
> > -       if (!shmem_channel_intr_enabled(smbox->shmem))
> > -               return;
> > -
> >         if (smbox->chan_platform_receiver)
> > -               intr = smbox->chan_platform_receiver;
> > +               intr_chan = smbox->chan_platform_receiver;
> >         else if (smbox->chan)
> > -               intr = smbox->chan;
> > -       else {
> > -               dev_err(cdev, "Channel INTR wrongly set?\n");
> > +               intr_chan = smbox->chan;
> > +
> > +       if (!(intr_chan && shmem_channel_intr_enabled(smbox->shmem)))
> >                 return;
> > -       }
> 
> Fine with dropping the dev_err() but is not this cumulative negated-if a
> bit cryptic...also you can bail out early straight away as before when
> platform has not required any P2A completion irq...I mean something like
>

Agreed, updated now.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep