[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6926ba88-42df-4917-b373-0b36ed80c0d7@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:34:18 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens
<hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Add "S390" to the swiotlb kernel parameter
Am 14.06.24 um 10:14 schrieb Thomas Huth:
> The "swiotlb" kernel parameter is used on s390 for protected virt since
> commit 64e1f0c531d1 ("s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization")
> and thus should be marked in kernel-parameters.txt accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> PS: I wonder whether we could remove IA-64 nowadays...?
probably
Powered by blists - more mailing lists