[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b5f11a6-52e3-55ca-8c80-dca8f7e0c7c7@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 15:14:10 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, johan+linaro@...nel.org,
bmasney@...hat.com, djakov@...nel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, vireshk@...nel.org, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com,
quic_skananth@...cinc.com, quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com,
quic_parass@...cinc.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/4] PCI: qcom: Add ICC bandwidth vote for CPU to
PCIe path
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> To access the host controller registers of the host controller and the
> endpoint BAR/config space, the CPU-PCIe ICC (interconnect) path should
> be voted otherwise it may lead to NoC (Network on chip) timeout.
> We are surviving because of other driver voting for this path.
>
> As there is less access on this path compared to PCIe to mem path
> add minimum vote i.e 1KBps bandwidth always which is sufficient enough
> to keep the path active and is recommended by HW team.
>
> During S2RAM (Suspend-to-RAM), the DBI access can happen very late (while
> disabling the boot CPU). So do not disable the CPU-PCIe interconnect path
> during S2RAM as that may lead to NoC error.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 5f9f0ff19baa..ff1d891c8b9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie {
> struct phy *phy;
> struct gpio_desc *reset;
> struct icc_path *icc_mem;
> + struct icc_path *icc_cpu;
> const struct qcom_pcie_cfg *cfg;
> struct dentry *debugfs;
> bool suspended;
> @@ -1369,6 +1370,9 @@ static int qcom_pcie_icc_init(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> if (IS_ERR(pcie->icc_mem))
> return PTR_ERR(pcie->icc_mem);
>
> + pcie->icc_cpu = devm_of_icc_get(pci->dev, "cpu-pcie");
> + if (IS_ERR(pcie->icc_cpu))
> + return PTR_ERR(pcie->icc_cpu);
> /*
> * Some Qualcomm platforms require interconnect bandwidth constraints
> * to be set before enabling interconnect clocks.
> @@ -1378,11 +1382,25 @@ static int qcom_pcie_icc_init(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> */
> ret = icc_set_bw(pcie->icc_mem, 0, QCOM_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_TO_BW(1));
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to set interconnect bandwidth: %d\n",
> + dev_err(pci->dev, "Failed to set bandwidth for PCIe-MEM interconnect path: %d\n",
> ret);
I think it would be better to separate these message clarifications into a
separate patch. It would make both patches more into the point.
Other than that, the change looked okay to me.
--
i.
> return ret;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Since the CPU-PCIe path is only used for activities like register
> + * access of the host controller and endpoint Config/BAR space access,
> + * HW team has recommended to use a minimal bandwidth of 1KBps just to
> + * keep the path active.
> + */
> + ret = icc_set_bw(pcie->icc_cpu, 0, kBps_to_icc(1));
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pci->dev, "Failed to set bandwidth for CPU-PCIe interconnect path: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + icc_set_bw(pcie->icc_mem, 0, 0);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1408,7 +1426,7 @@ static void qcom_pcie_icc_update(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>
> ret = icc_set_bw(pcie->icc_mem, 0, width * QCOM_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_TO_BW(speed));
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to set interconnect bandwidth: %d\n",
> + dev_err(pci->dev, "Failed to set bandwidth for PCIe-MEM interconnect path: %d\n",
> ret);
> }
> }
> @@ -1570,7 +1588,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> */
> ret = icc_set_bw(pcie->icc_mem, 0, kBps_to_icc(1));
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to set interconnect bandwidth: %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set bandwidth for PCIe-MEM interconnect path: %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1594,7 +1612,18 @@ static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> pcie->suspended = true;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + /*
> + * Only disable CPU-PCIe interconnect path if the suspend is non-S2RAM.
> + * Because on some platforms, DBI access can happen very late during the
> + * S2RAM and a non-active CPU-PCIe interconnect path may lead to NoC
> + * error.
> + */
> + if (pm_suspend_target_state != PM_SUSPEND_MEM) {
> + ret = icc_disable(pcie->icc_cpu);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to disable CPU-PCIe interconnect path: %d\n", ret);
> + }
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int qcom_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> @@ -1602,6 +1631,14 @@ static int qcom_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> struct qcom_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret;
>
> + if (pm_suspend_target_state != PM_SUSPEND_MEM) {
> + ret = icc_enable(pcie->icc_cpu);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable CPU-PCIe interconnect path: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (pcie->suspended) {
> ret = qcom_pcie_host_init(&pcie->pci->pp);
> if (ret)
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists