lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bdeabe-7fe4-47fd-9903-8603a07b6938@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:35:13 +0530
From: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
 rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com, melissa.srw@...il.com, mairacanal@...eup.net,
 hamohammed.sa@...il.com, robdclark@...il.com,
 maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
 daniels@...labora.com, helen.koike@...labora.com,
 guilherme.gallo@...labora.com, sergi.blanch.torne@...labora.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/ci: add tests on vkms

Hi Maxime,

On 13/06/24 22:58, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 01:56:10PM GMT, Vignesh Raman wrote:
>> On 13/06/24 13:07, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 02:40:37PM GMT, Vignesh Raman wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/vkms-none-flakes.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/vkms-none-flakes.txt
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..56484a30aff5
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/vkms-none-flakes.txt
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>>>> +# Board Name: vkms
>>>> +# Bug Report: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/61ed26af-062c-443c-9df2-d1ee319f3fb0@collabora.com/T/#u
>>>> +# Failure Rate: 50
>>>> +# IGT Version: 1.28-g0df7b9b97
>>>> +# Linux Version: 6.9.0-rc7
>>>> +kms_cursor_legacy@...g-nonblocking-modeset-vs-cursor-atomic
>>>> +kms_flip@...ic-flip-vs-wf_vblank
>>>> +kms_flip@...p-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible
>>>> +kms_flip@...p-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible
>>>> +kms_flip@...in-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible
>>>> +kms_flip@...in-flip-ts-check
>>>> +kms_flip@...in-flip-ts-check-interruptible
>>>> +kms_flip@...p-vs-absolute-wf_vblank
>>>> +kms_flip@...p-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible
>>>> +kms_flip@...p-vs-blocking-wf-vblank
>>>
>>> We should have the header for every line here
>>
>> All the flakes in these tests were observed with version
>> 6.9.0-rc7/1.28-g0df7b9b97. So can we group them together?
>>
>> If we update this file for different IGT/kernel version, we can add a
>> separate header for each test.
> 
> If we don't however, we have no way to tell in a couple months whether
> those flakes were there before we were adding those metadata, or if the
> metadata applies to everything, or only a subset.

I will send a v6 with this change. Thanks.

Regards,
Vignesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ