[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240614142053.00005a9c@Huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 14:20:53 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "Philipp
Stanner" <pstanner@...hat.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Wilczyński
<kw@...ux.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jonathan Hunter
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>, "Thierry
Reding" <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: Introduce ALIGN_DOWN_IF_NONZERO() helper
locally
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:06:06 +0300
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> pci_bus_distribute_available_resources() performs alignment in case of
> non-zero alignment requirement on 3 occasions. Introduce
> ALIGN_DOWN_IF_NONZERO() helper to avoid coding the non-zero check 3
> times.
>
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> I tried to look other similar cases for both ALIGN() and ALIGN_DOWN()
> kernel-wide but it seems this is not very common so I did not put
> ALIGN_DOWN_IF_NONZERO() into the generic header.
Makes sense. It's a weird quirk of the return value of
pci_resource_alignement() to return 0 when it really means 1.
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> index 004405edf290..39552d1a1793 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -1819,6 +1819,9 @@ static void remove_dev_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, struct resource *io,
> }
> }
>
> +#define ALIGN_DOWN_IF_NONZERO(addr, align) \
> + ((align) ? ALIGN_DOWN((addr), (align)) : (addr))
> +
> /*
> * io, mmio and mmio_pref contain the total amount of bridge window space
> * available. This includes the minimal space needed to cover all the
> @@ -1930,8 +1933,7 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
> * what is available).
> */
> align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, res);
> - resource_set_size(&io, align ? ALIGN_DOWN(io_per_b, align)
> - : io_per_b);
> + resource_set_size(&io, ALIGN_DOWN_IF_NONZERO(io_per_b, align));
>
> /*
> * The x_per_b holds the extra resource space that can be
> @@ -1943,15 +1945,13 @@ static void pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
>
> res = &dev->resource[PCI_BRIDGE_MEM_WINDOW];
> align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, res);
> - resource_set_size(&mmio, align ? ALIGN_DOWN(mmio_per_b, align)
> - : mmio_per_b);
> + resource_set_size(&mmio, ALIGN_DOWN_IF_NONZERO(mmio_per_b, align));
> mmio.start -= resource_size(res);
>
> res = &dev->resource[PCI_BRIDGE_PREF_MEM_WINDOW];
> align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, res);
> resource_set_size(&mmio_pref,
> - align ? ALIGN_DOWN(mmio_pref_per_b, align)
> - : mmio_pref_per_b);
> + ALIGN_DOWN_IF_NONZERO(mmio_pref_per_b, align));
> mmio_pref.start -= resource_size(res);
>
> pci_bus_distribute_available_resources(b, add_list, io, mmio,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists