[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171837125174.3039059.16928717312076037768.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 06:31:16 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf record: Ensure space for lost samples
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:06:26 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Previous allocation didn't account for sample ID written after the
> lost samples event. Switch from malloc/free to a stack allocation.
>
>
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Arnaldo, I'll resolve the conflict when I merge perf-tools later which
has the revert.
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists