linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/317] 5.10.219-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024061545-cold-fancied-1bd0@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 13:00:18 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
	Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
	clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/317] 5.10.219-rc1 review

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:35:23PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:43:41PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 17:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.219 release.
> > > There are 317 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.219-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > 
> > The following build errors are noticed on riscv with clang-18 toolchain
> > but gcc-12 builds pass.
> > 
> > However, compared with older releases this is a build regression on
> > stable-rc 5.10.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> > 
> > riscv:
> >  defconfig - gcc-12 - PASS
> >  defconfig - clang-18 - FAILED
> > 
> > Build error:
> > ------
> > arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c:75:52: error: incompatible pointer to
> > integer conversion passing 'void *' to parameter of type 'unsigned
> > long' [-Wint-conversion]
> >    75 |                                 if
> > (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc)))
> >       |
> >                 ^~~
> > include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: expanded from macro 'unlikely'
> >    78 | # define unlikely(x)    __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
> >       |                                             ^
> > arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c:75:57: error: incompatible integer to
> > pointer conversion passing 'unsigned long' to parameter of type 'void
> > *' [-Wint-conversion]
> >    75 |                                 if
> > (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc)))
> >       |
> >                      ^~
> > include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: expanded from macro 'unlikely'
> >    78 | # define unlikely(x)    __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
> >       |                                             ^
> > 2 errors generated.
> > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:286:
> > arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.o] Error 1
> 
> It looks like either commit 9dd97064e21f ("riscv: Make stack walk
> callback consistent with generic code") should be applied with the
> straight from upstream copy of commit 7ecdadf7f8c6 ("riscv: stacktrace:
> Make walk_stackframe cross pt_regs frame") or the latter commit's 5.10
> backport should be modified to match the linux-5.10.y order of the
> arguments:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index c38b20caad7c..010e4c881c8b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
>  			pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, NULL, frame->ra,
>  						   &frame->ra);
>  			if (pc == (unsigned long)ret_from_exception) {
> -				if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc)))
> +				if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(pc, arg)))
>  					break;
>  
>  				pc = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->epc;

I'll just drop these riscv patches from 5.10.y, as odds are, no one is
using that arch in that old tree anymore.  And if they are, they can
send working patches :)

thanks,

greg k-h