linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024061514-veneering-facecloth-8508@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 13:09:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 10:43:37AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 6/13/24 04:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Introduced in 6.1.93:
> 
> Building csky:allmodconfig ... failed
> Building m68k:allmodconfig ... failed
> Building xtensa:allmodconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:105:
> kernel/sched/isolation.c: In function 'housekeeping_setup':
> kernel/sched/isolation.c:134:53: error: 'setup_max_cpus' undeclared
> 
> The same problem also affects v6.6.y, starting with v6.6.33.
> 
> Commit 3c2f8859ae1c ("smp: Provide 'setup_max_cpus' definition on UP too")
> fixes the (build) problem in both branches.

Now queued up for 6.6.y and 6.1.y, thanks.

greg k-h