[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240615185516.61346425@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 18:55:16 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Michael Hennerich
<michael.hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add AD4695 and similar ADCs
> >> +
> >> + adi,pin-pairing:
> >> + description: |
> >> + The input pin pairing for the negative input. This can be:
> >> + - REFGND, normally 0V (single-ended)
> >> + - COM, normally V_REF/2, see com-supply (pseudo-differential)
> >> + - For even numbered pins, the next odd numbered pin (differential)
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> >> + enum: [refgnd, com, next]
> >
> > Next is full on differential, just provide both channels via
> > diff-channels. You can constrain the particular combinations in the binding.
> >
> > Refcnd is normal single ended. Probably want to use the new single-channel
> > property for that as we are mixing differential and single ended channels
> > so reg is pretty much just an index.
> >
> > Hmm. For comm we haven't had done a recent binding for a chip with the option
> > of pseudo differential that is per channel, they've been whole device only.
> > That feels like it will be common enough we need to support it cleanly
> > with a 'general' scheme.
>
> I think we have. :-)
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/adc6cba9-2e79-475f-9c24-039fe9d3345d@baylibre.com/T/#mcbc1ce3a2541db502bf7870b7ea8574626a46312
>
My goldfish like memory strikes again. Had completely forgotten that :)
> >
> > Problem is I know someone will have a chip with 2 vincom pins and selecting
> > between them, so we can't just have pseudo-differential as a boolean and adc.yaml
> >
> > There are horrible solutions like a magic channel number that changes the
> > meaning of diff-channels but that's ugly.
> > Maybe pseudo-differential for now and we have to later we add
> > pseudo-differential-comm = <0> etc?
> >
>
> I was trying to keep things simple with 1 property instead of 3, but we
> can drop adi,pin-pairing and use the standard diff-channels, single-channel
> and common-mode-channel properties.
Sounds good.
>
> >> +examples:
> >> + - |
> >> + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> >> +
> >> + spi {
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> +
> >> + adc@0 {
> >> + compatible = "adi,ad4695";
> >> + reg = <0>;
> >> + spi-cpol;
> >> + spi-cpha;
> >> + spi-max-frequency = <80000000>;
> >> + avdd-supply = <&supply_2_5V>;
> >> + vdd-supply = <&supply_1_8V>;
> >> + vio-supply = <&supply_1_2V>;
> >> + ref-supply = <&supply_5V>;
> >> + reset-gpios = <&gpio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> >> +
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> +
>
> Using the standard adc.yaml properties, these would now be:
>
> >> + /* Differential channel between IN0 and IN1. */
> >> + channel@0 {
> >> + reg = <0>;
>
> diff-channels = <0>, <1>;
>
> >> + bipolar;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + /* Single-ended channel between IN2 and REFGND. */
> >> + channel@2 {
> >> + reg = <2>;
>
> single-channel = <2>;
> common-mode-channel = <0>;
I wonder if we count ground ad default and so don't necessarily
specify this?
I don't really mind either way though. Maybe just default to 0 works.
>
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + /* Pseudo-differential channel between IN3 and COM. */
> >> + channel@f {
> >> + reg = <3>;
>
> single-channel = <3>;
> common-mode-channel = <1>;
>
> >> + bipolar;
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >
>
> And I will add a header file with macros for the common mode
> channel values.
Great
Jonathan
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists