[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6qzf74ex5mrwfjbzknnqcaiy53ifjaiean2snutvn2hwoypsgy@xdcwzkmsxvzf>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:12:23 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] docs: i2c: summary: document use of inclusive
language
Hi Wolfram,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 10:12:42AM GMT, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> We now have the updated I2C specs and our own Code of Conduct, so we
> have all we need to switch over to the inclusive terminology. Define
> them here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists