[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a4cd7bd-86c1-46af-9d15-1fa0e0dbfb47@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 19:32:45 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, "Greg
Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Logan Gunthorpe
<logang@...tatee.com>, Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>, Shiraz
Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>, Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...dia.com>,
"Artemy Kovalyov" <artemyko@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kernfs: remove page_mkwrite() from
vm_operations_struct
On 6/11/24 11:27 AM, Martin Oliveira wrote:
> The .page_mkwrite operator of kernfs just calls file_update_time().
> This is the same behaviour that the fault code does if .page_mkwrite is
> not set.
>
> Furthermore, having the page_mkwrite() operator causes
> writable_file_mapping_allowed() to fail due to
> vma_needs_dirty_tracking() on the gup flow, which is a pre-requisite for
> enabling P2PDMA over RDMA.
>
> There are no users of .page_mkwrite and no known valid use cases, so
> just remove the .page_mkwrite from kernfs_ops and return -EINVAL if an
> mmap() implementation sets .page_mkwrite.
Hi Martin and Logan!
First of all, I admire this approach to solving one of the gup+filesystem
interaction problems, by coming in from the other direction. Neat. :)
>
> Co-developed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>
> ---
> fs/kernfs/file.c | 26 +++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> index 8502ef68459b9..a198cb0718772 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> @@ -386,28 +386,6 @@ static vm_fault_t kernfs_vma_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static vm_fault_t kernfs_vma_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> -{
> - struct file *file = vmf->vma->vm_file;
> - struct kernfs_open_file *of = kernfs_of(file);
> - vm_fault_t ret;
> -
> - if (!of->vm_ops)
> - return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> -
> - if (!kernfs_get_active(of->kn))
> - return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> -
> - ret = 0;
> - if (of->vm_ops->page_mkwrite)
> - ret = of->vm_ops->page_mkwrite(vmf);
> - else
> - file_update_time(file);
> -
> - kernfs_put_active(of->kn);
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> static int kernfs_vma_access(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> void *buf, int len, int write)
> {
> @@ -432,7 +410,6 @@ static int kernfs_vma_access(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> static const struct vm_operations_struct kernfs_vm_ops = {
> .open = kernfs_vma_open,
> .fault = kernfs_vma_fault,
> - .page_mkwrite = kernfs_vma_page_mkwrite,
> .access = kernfs_vma_access,
> };
>
> @@ -482,6 +459,9 @@ static int kernfs_fop_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->close)
> goto out_put;
>
> + if (vma->vm_ops->page_mkwrite)
As the kernel test bot results imply, you probably want to do it like this:
if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->page_mkwrite)
> + goto out_put;
> +
> rc = 0;
> if (!of->mmapped) {
> of->mmapped = true;
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists