lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61476e92-aba4-4726-984c-d845e5fc4dd3@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 03:08:55 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
Cc: Omer Shpigelman <oshpigelman@...ana.ai>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, ogabbay@...nel.org,
	zyehudai@...ana.ai
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] net: hbl_en: add habanalabs Ethernet driver

> > +static void hbl_en_reset_stats(struct hbl_aux_dev *aux_dev, u32 port_idx)
> > +{
> > +	struct hbl_en_port *port = HBL_EN_PORT(aux_dev, port_idx);
> > +
> > +	port->net_stats.rx_packets = 0;
> > +	port->net_stats.tx_packets = 0;
> > +	port->net_stats.rx_bytes = 0;
> > +	port->net_stats.tx_bytes = 0;
> > +	port->net_stats.tx_errors = 0;
> > +	atomic64_set(&port->net_stats.rx_dropped, 0);
> > +	atomic64_set(&port->net_stats.tx_dropped, 0);
> 
> per-cpu variable is better?

Please trim replies to just the needed context. Is this the only
comment in this 2300 line email? Do i need to keep searching for more
comments?

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ