linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Introducing TIF_NOTIFY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 10:05:36 +0530
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Gautham R. Shenoy"
	<gautham.shenoy@....com>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>, Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
	Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, Dinh Nguyen
	<dinguyen@...nel.org>, Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>, Stefan Kristiansson
	<stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>, Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, Helge Deller
	<deller@....de>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin
	<npiggin@...il.com>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "Naveen
 N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, Yoshinori Sato
	<ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, "John Paul
 Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>, Thomas Gleixner
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov
	<bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin"
	<hpa@...or.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Daniel Lezcano
	<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Juri
 Lelli" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt
	<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman
	<mgorman@...e.de>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>, "Valentin
 Schneider" <vschneid@...hat.com>, Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Gray <bgray@...ux.ibm.com>, Frederic Weisbecker
	<frederic@...nel.org>, Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>, Kees Cook
	<keescook@...omium.org>, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "Tony
 Battersby" <tonyb@...ernetics.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@...il.com>, Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>, Imran
 Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, "Rik
 van Riel" <riel@...riel.com>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, David
 Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
	<linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Introducing TIF_NOTIFY_IPI flag

Hello Russell,

On 6/15/2024 7:56 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 06:15:59PM +0000, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>> o Dropping the ARM results since I never got my hands on the ARM64
>>    system I used in my last testing. If I do manage to get my hands on it
>>    again, I'll rerun the experiments and share the results on the thread.
>>    To test the case where TIF_NOTIFY_IPI is not enabled for a particular
>>    architecture, I applied the series only until Patch 3 and tested the
>>    same on my x86 machine with a WARN_ON_ONCE() in do_idle() to check if
>>    tif_notify_ipi() ever return true and then repeated the same with
>>    Patch 4 applied.
> 
> Confused. ARM (32-bit) or ARM64? You patch 32-bit ARM, but you don't
> touch 64-bit Arm. "ARM" on its own in the context above to me suggests
> 32-bit, since you refer to ARM64 later.
> 

In my first RFC posting, I had shared the results for ipistorm on an
ARM64 server [1]. Vincent and Linus Walleij brought to my attention that
ARM32 and ARM64 do not share the thread info flags and I probably saw a
one-off behavior during my testing. Since then, it has been slightly
challenging to get my hands on that machine again in a stable condition
to see if there was any scenario that I might have missed but I tried a
bunch of things on my x86 machine to confirm that an arch that does not
define the TIF_NOTIFY_IPI would not hit these changes.

Rest assured, Patch 5 is for ARM32 machines that currently define
TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240220171457.703-6-kprateek.nayak@amd.com/

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek