linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Split and enforce documenting MFD children

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <237035a7-3b71-4245-863b-f905ba97cda1@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:35:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
 Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jacky Huang <ychuang3@...oton.com>, Shan-Chun Hung <schung@...oton.com>,
 Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lars Povlsen
 <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
 Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
 Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Split and enforce
 documenting MFD children

On 17/06/2024 18:46, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>  
>>> +# Need a select with all compatibles listed for compatibility with older
>>> +# dtschema (<2024.02), so this will not be selected for other schemas having
>>> +# syscon fallback.
>>>  select:
>>>    properties:
>>>      compatible:
>>>        contains:
>>>          enum:
>>> -          - syscon
>>
>> Wow, this is noisy. Is it not possible to achieve something similar by
>> making the select check for not: compatible: contains: simple-mfd? Or
>> did I misunderstand the intention here?
> 
> Ah, you'd match things then like the intel,lgm-syscon, right?

Yes.

Best regards,
Krzysztof