lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240617231137.80726-1-21cnbao@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:11:34 +1200
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	david@...hat.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	chrisl@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mhocko@...e.com,
	ryan.roberts@....com,
	shy828301@...il.com,
	surenb@...gle.com,
	v-songbaohua@...o.com,
	willy@...radead.org,
	ying.huang@...el.com,
	yosryahmed@...gle.com,
	yuzhao@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: clarify folio_add_new_anon_rmap() and __folio_add_anon_rmap()

From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>

The whole thing was originally suggested by David while we tried
to weaken the WARN_ON in __folio_add_anon_rmap() while bringing up
mTHP swapin[1]. This patchset is also preparatory work for mTHP
swapin.

folio_add_new_anon_rmap() assumes that new anon rmaps are always
exclusive. However, this assumption doesn’t hold true for cases
like do_swap_page(), where a new anon might be added to the
swapcache and is not necessarily exclusive.

The patchset extends the rmap flags to allow folio_add_new_anon_rmap()
to handle both exclusive and non-exclusive new anon folios.
The do_swap_page() function is updated to use this extended API with
rmap flags. Consequently, all new anon folios now consistently use
folio_add_new_anon_rmap().
The special case for !folio_test_anon() in __folio_add_anon_rmap() can
be safely removed.

In conclusion, new anon folios always use folio_add_new_anon_rmap(),
regardless of exclusivity. Old anon folios continue to use
__folio_add_anon_rmap() via folio_add_anon_rmap_pmd() and
folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes().

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240118111036.72641-6-21cnbao@gmail.com/

-v2:
 * fix crashes reported by Yuan Shuai during swapoff, thanks; David
   also commented unuse_pte() for swapoff;
 * add comments for !anon according to David, thanks;
 * add Yuan Shuai's tested-by tags, thanks for Yuan Shuai's testing
   on real phones;
 * refine changelog;

-v1(RFC):
 https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240613000721.23093-1-21cnbao@gmail.com/

Barry Song (3):
  mm: extend rmap flags arguments for folio_add_new_anon_rmap
  mm: use folio_add_new_anon_rmap() if folio_test_anon(folio)==false
  mm: remove folio_test_anon(folio)==false path in
    __folio_add_anon_rmap()

 include/linux/rmap.h    |  2 +-
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |  2 +-
 mm/huge_memory.c        |  2 +-
 mm/khugepaged.c         |  2 +-
 mm/memory.c             | 18 +++++++++++++-----
 mm/migrate_device.c     |  2 +-
 mm/rmap.c               | 34 +++++++++++++---------------------
 mm/swapfile.c           | 15 ++++++++++++---
 mm/userfaultfd.c        |  2 +-
 9 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ