linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_omap: Implementation of Errata i2310

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46e0461e-08e2-4fcd-80dc-f1213d57489b@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:17:54 +0530
From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@...com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <vigneshr@...com>, <nm@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        <ronald.wahl@...itan.com>, <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_omap: Implementation of Errata i2310

Hi Greg

On 6/17/2024 11:52 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:52:53AM +0530, Udit Kumar wrote:
>> As per Errata i2310[0], Erroneous timeout can be triggered,
>> if this Erroneous interrupt is not cleared then it may leads
>> to storm of interrupts, therefore apply Errata i2310 solution.
>>
>> [0] https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sprz536 page 23
>>
>> Fixes: b67e830d38fa ("serial: 8250: 8250_omap: Fix possible interrupt storm on K3 SoCs")
>> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>
>> ---
>> Test logs
>> https://gist.github.com/uditkumarti/7a7ab6994581bbb09cf1a4271c592d8e
>>
>> Change logs
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Added Fixes Tag and typo correction in commit message
>> - Corrected bit position to UART_OMAP_EFR2_TIMEOUT_BEHAVE
>> Link to v1
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240614061314.290840-1-u-kumar1@ti.com/
>>
>>   drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> Hi,
>
> This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
> a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
> to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
> writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
> created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
> in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
> kernel tree.
>
> You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
> as indicated below:
>
> - You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
>    older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
>    signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
>    applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
>    follow the documented rules in the
>    Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
>    this.
>
> If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
> how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
> Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
> from other developers.


I realized the same due to other patches, this not getting applied 
cleanly on stable (using git am).

Let me know if you are ok,  I will port this to stable kernel, once this 
is merged into Linux tree.


>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h's patch email bot