[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZnAUy5C-DXEuliSm@ryzen.lan>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:49:47 +0200
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] ata: libata-scsi: Report valid sense data for ATA
PT if present
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 07:18:34PM +0000, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
> Do not generate sense data from ATA status/error registers
> if valid sense data is already present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 79e8103ef3a9..4bfe47e7d266 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -858,12 +858,17 @@ static void ata_gen_passthru_sense(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> unsigned char *desc = sb + 8;
> u8 sense_key, asc, ascq;
Like I suggested in the earlier patch,
can't you do a:
if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID)
return;
here instead?
>
> - /*
> - * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits
> - * onto sense key, asc & ascq.
> - */
> - if (qc->err_mask ||
> - tf->status & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DF | ATA_ERR | ATA_DRQ)) {
> + if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID) {
> + /*
> + * Do not generate sense data from ATA status/error
> + * registers if valid sense data is already present.
> + */
> + } else if (qc->err_mask ||
> + tf->status & (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DF | ATA_ERR | ATA_DRQ)) {
> + /*
> + * Use ata_to_sense_error() to map status register bits
> + * onto sense key, asc & ascq.
> + */
> ata_to_sense_error(qc->ap->print_id, tf->status, tf->error,
> &sense_key, &asc, &ascq);
> ata_scsi_set_sense(qc->dev, cmd, sense_key, asc, ascq);
> --
> 2.45.2.627.g7a2c4fd464-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists