lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tthrn8gf.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:56:48 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,  Michael Nemanov
 <michael.nemanov@...com>,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless v2] wifi: wlcore: fix wlcore AP mode

"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> writes:

> I see all my TI Wilink patches have been marked as "deferred" in the
> wireless patchwork. Please could you explain what the plan is with
> these patches, especially this one which fixes a serious frustrating
> failing that makes AP mode on this hardware very unreliable and thus
> useless.

I'm just swamped with patches, I'll try to look at these soon.

I wish that TI would take a more active role in upstream, for example
reviewing and testing patches would help a lot.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ