linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH wireless v2] wifi: wlcore: fix wlcore AP mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:56:48 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,  Michael Nemanov
 <michael.nemanov@...com>,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless v2] wifi: wlcore: fix wlcore AP mode

"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> writes:

> I see all my TI Wilink patches have been marked as "deferred" in the
> wireless patchwork. Please could you explain what the plan is with
> these patches, especially this one which fixes a serious frustrating
> failing that makes AP mode on this hardware very unreliable and thus
> useless.

I'm just swamped with patches, I'll try to look at these soon.

I wish that TI would take a more active role in upstream, for example
reviewing and testing patches would help a lot.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches