linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] signal.7: Fix wrong mention of sigprocmask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ap6zlyayczxurkituv4r4hpyqrmne6rsu5hnll3vgrvh2dw6x3@mqt5dzkdrccn>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:59:52 +0200
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, linux-man@...r.kernel.org, 
	mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com, ryan.roberts@....com, 
	suzuki.poulose@....com, Anshuman.Khandual@....com, DeepakKumar.Mishra@....com, 
	aneesh.kumar@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] signal.7: Fix wrong mention of sigprocmask

Hi Dev, Mark,

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 02:06:31PM GMT, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 02:38:23PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> > The handler is registered with sigaction(), not sigprocmask(). Even if the
> > purpose of writing sigprocmask() here was to mention blocked signals, the
> > statement currently concerns the "addition" of blocked signals; signals
> > blocked through sigprocmask() would already be present in the thread
> > context of blocked signals.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

Thanks for the patch and the review!  I've applied the patch.  It will
be included in the man-pages-6.9.1 release later today.

Have a lovely day!
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)