linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 3/3] rtc: tps6594: Add power management support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240618141851.1810000-4-richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:18:51 +0200
From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>,
	Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
	Esteban Blanc <eblanc@...libre.com>,
	linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] rtc: tps6594: Add power management support

Add power management support to the driver. This allows a SoC to wake
from suspend using the nINT provided by the RTC.
It takes care of the case when the interrupt has not been caught because
the kernel has not yet woke up.
(This is the case when only edges interrupt are caught)

Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c
index 06af177b2d78..e69667634137 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
 
 struct tps6594_rtc {
 	struct rtc_device *rtc_dev;
+	int irq;
 };
 
 static int tps6594_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev,
@@ -419,6 +420,8 @@ static int tps6594_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (irq < 0)
 		return dev_err_probe(dev, irq, "Failed to get irq\n");
 
+	rtc->irq = irq;
+
 	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, tps6594_rtc_interrupt,
 					IRQF_ONESHOT, TPS6594_IRQ_NAME_ALARM,
 					dev);
@@ -438,6 +441,49 @@ static int tps6594_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return devm_rtc_register_device(rtc->rtc_dev);
 }
 
+static int tps6594_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct tps6594 *tps = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+	struct tps6594_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_test_bits(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_INT_STARTUP,
+			       TPS6594_BIT_RTC_INT);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to read REG_INT_STARTUP: %d\n", ret);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (ret > 0) {
+		/*
+		 * If the alarm bit is set, it means that the IRQ has been
+		 * fired. But, the kernel may not have woke up yet when it
+		 * happened. So, we have to clear it.
+		 */
+		ret = regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_RTC_STATUS,
+				   TPS6594_BIT_ALARM);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			dev_err(dev, "error clearing alarm bit: %d", ret);
+
+		rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtc_dev, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
+	}
+out:
+	disable_irq_wake(rtc->irq);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int tps6594_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct tps6594_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	enable_irq_wake(rtc->irq);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tps6594_rtc_pm_ops, tps6594_rtc_suspend, tps6594_rtc_resume);
+
 static const struct platform_device_id tps6594_rtc_id_table[] = {
 	{ "tps6594-rtc", },
 	{}
@@ -448,6 +494,7 @@ static struct platform_driver tps6594_rtc_driver = {
 	.probe		= tps6594_rtc_probe,
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "tps6594-rtc",
+		.pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&tps6594_rtc_pm_ops),
 	},
 	.id_table = tps6594_rtc_id_table,
 };